Regulatory Standards · United States
FedRAMP
FedRAMP continuous monitoring, without the scramble.
FedRAMP authorisation is only the start: continuous monitoring demands ongoing scanning, POA&M tracking and evidence. Astragar keeps it organised and prioritised.
Book a FedRAMP review✓ Available in Astragar GRC
3
Impact levels: Low, Moderate, High
800-53
NIST control baselines underpin requirements
Monthly
Vulnerability scanning in continuous monitoring
What FedRAMP requires
The obligations, in brief.
Baseline controls
Implement the NIST 800-53 baseline for your impact level.
Assessment
Independent assessment by an accredited 3PAO.
POA&Ms
Track and remediate weaknesses within required timeframes.
Continuous monitoring
Monthly scanning and reporting to maintain authorisation.
How Astragar helps
From checklist to measurable risk.
01
Requirement → control mapping
Map every FedRAMP requirement to controls, systems, assets and owners.
02
Evidence, continuously
Collect and maintain evidence, with sign-off from contributor to IT auditor, CISO and executive office.
03
Exposure behind the gaps
See which vulnerabilities and sensitive data put FedRAMP controls at risk.
04
Risk in financial terms
Prioritise remediation by business and financial impact, not checklist order.
Astragar prioritises POA&M items by exploitability and impact, so the riskiest findings close first.
Sign-off workflow
Evidence Contributor
→IT Auditor
→CISO
→Executive Office
Related · Government, Critical Infrastructure & AI
European Union
NIS2 →
Saudi Arabia
NCA ECC →
European Union
EU CRA →
United States
CMMC →
European Union
EU AI Act →
Global
ISO 42001 →
Global
NIST AI RMF →
Find the data. Test the controls. Reduce the risk.
Start with a scoped FedRAMP review: requirements mapped, evidence gaps found, remediation prioritised by financial impact.
Book a FedRAMP reviewAstragar supports compliance programmes with technical evidence and risk analysis. It does not provide legal advice or issue certifications.
See your cyber risk in $ terms, not CVSS scores.
