Insurance · Carriers, brokers & MGAs
Better evidence from security data — not more of it.
The CISO sees vulnerabilities and controls. The risk manager needs financial impact, retention and limit. Astragar is the evidence layer between them, so submissions, pricing and claims rest on something defensible.
Thousands of vulnerabilities become a handful of decisions.
Astragar works from vulnerability and asset data without needing access to the insured's security environment, then connects vulnerabilities, controls and loss scenarios to quantify residual risk. The output answers the four questions insurance actually asks: what can realistically go wrong, which controls materially change that, what the financial impact would be, and what that means for cover. Portfolio-level roll-up across a cyber book is in development.
Quantified submissions
Coverage gap by scenario
Claims-ready evidence
Where it lands
One evidence layer, three different jobs.
Underwriters
Price against evidence rather than a questionnaire. Vulnerabilities, controls and sensitive data mapped to loss scenarios, so the submission states what can go wrong and what it would cost.
Brokers
Take a defensible story to market: quantified residual risk, coverage gaps by scenario against the current policy, and a renewal narrative that shows what changed and why.
The insured
Policy conditions converted into controls and evidenced continuously, so what a claim requires already exists rather than being reconstructed after the incident.
Next step
See a quantified submission on your own book.
Bring a risk you are working on and we will show the exposure in dollars, the controls that move it, and where the policy would respond.
See your cyber risk in $ terms, not CVSS scores.
