Use Case · Astragar for Microsoft Security

Microsoft shows you the security signals. Astragar shows you the business risk.

Turn Microsoft security data into quantified business risk.

Connect Microsoft Defender, Sentinel, Entra, Intune and Purview to quantify cyber exposure, prove control effectiveness, prioritise remediation and insure the risk that remains.

Instead of
18,427vulnerabilities
643high severity
91critical
The CISO, CRO and CFO see
$31.4Mtotal modelled cyber exposure
$12.6Mconcentrated in 7 scenarios
$8.1Mreducible through 14 remediation actions

Illustrative figures.

The business-risk layer above Microsoft Security

Thousands of signals. Five business questions.

Microsoft gathers technical security evidence. Astragar connects it to assets, business services, controls, sensitive data, financial exposure and cyber insurance.

01
What can hurt us?
02
What could it cost?
03
What should we fix first?
04
Are our controls working?
05
Would insurance cover what remains?

01 · The workflow

From Microsoft evidence to an economic remediation queue.

Microsoft Security sources

Defender Vulnerability Management
Defender for Endpoint
Defender XDR
Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Entra
Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Purview
↓
STEP 01
Collect
Import and normalise Microsoft evidence, then connect it to the wider risk environment.
VulnerabilitiesAlertsIncidentsAssetsIdentitiesConfiguration findingsSensitive-data contextControl evidence
STEP 02
Contextualise
Link every finding through the business-risk chain, so a critical CVE on a test box doesn't outrank the attack path to revenue.
STEP 03
Quantify
For each material scenario: inherent risk, control effectiveness and residual risk, in dollars.
STEP 04
Prioritise
Rank remediation by exposure reduced per dollar spent. Fix, refer or accept.

The business-risk chain

Vulnerability
→
Asset
→
Identity
→
Sensitive Data
→
Business Service
→
Control
→
Risk Scenario
Quantify · Ransomware scenario
Inherent risk
Potential gross loss before controls
$14.2M
Control effectiveness
Modelled reduction from existing controls
− $8.7M
Residual risk
Exposure remaining after controls
$5.5M
Why context matters
A critical vulnerability on an insignificant test system should not automatically outrank a lower-scored one in the attack path to a revenue-generating system.
Astragar adds the business context needed to tell them apart.

Prioritise

Every action priced. Every decision defensible.

ActionMicrosoft evidenceExposure reductionCostDecision
Patch exposed server groupDefender VM$3.2M$18KFix
Enforce privileged MFAEntra$2.1M$8KFix
Protect sensitive datasetPurview$1.4M$35KFix
Harden cloud workloadDefender for Cloud$780K$60KRefer
Low-impact vulnerability groupDefender VM$40K$90KAccept

Illustrative figures.

02 · Prove the financial value of Microsoft Security

Show what your Microsoft security investment is doing for the business.

Many enterprises invest heavily in Microsoft security, yet struggle to show its value to the CFO or board. The Microsoft Security Value Report translates controls into an economic view of risk.

$42.8M
Modelled inherent cyber exposure
$25.5M
Modelled exposure mitigated by existing controls
$17.3M
Current residual exposure

Modelled exposure reduction by control domain

Identity
Entra, MFA, Conditional Access
$7.2M
Endpoint
Defender for Endpoint
$5.8M
Detection & response
Defender XDR + Sentinel
$4.5M
Cloud
Defender for Cloud
$4.1M
Data protection
Purview
$3.9M

Illustrative. Figures are modelled risk reductions, not claims that an individual Microsoft product directly “saved” that amount.

03 · Connect Microsoft Security to cyber insurance

We've secured the Microsoft environment. What risk is left, and have we transferred enough of it?

Microsoft Security
→
Astragar
→
$17.3M residual risk
→
Your cyber policy
→
Coverage gap
Technical evidence → business evidence
Financial exposure → insurance evidence
Upload your policy or treaty
ScenarioResidual exposureEstimated insuredPotential gap
Ransomware$5.5M$5.0M$0.5M
Data breach$4.2M$2.8M$1.4M
Business interruption$3.7M$2.0M$1.7M
Cloud outage$2.1M$0.5M$1.6M

Illustrative figures.

Fix it
Remediate where the exposure reduction justifies the cost.
Accept it
Knowingly retain low-impact risk, with evidence.
Transfer it
Insure what remains. For eligible US organisations, via Sternwake.

The same evidence used to identify and reduce cyber risk can also support insurance discussions. About Sternwake →

04 · Board-level reporting

The board doesn't need thousands of Defender alerts.

Astragar turns Microsoft evidence into a business-risk scorecard.

Cyber exposure
$31.4M
Total modelled
Exposure change
↓ $4.7M
This quarter
Top risk
$8.2M
Ransomware against customer operations
Most valuable fix
$2.4M
Privileged identity hardening
Control posture
87%
Controls evidenced as effective
Insurance coverage
$15M
Current cyber limit
Potential coverage gap
$6.3M
Residual risk not transferred
Evidence confidence
82%
Backed by operational evidence
From
“How many critical vulnerabilities do we have?”
To
“How much cyber exposure do we have, where is it concentrated, what are we doing about it, and how much remains?”

Illustrative figures.

05 · Microsoft Security optimisation

Are you getting full value from Microsoft Security?

Unused capability
Security functionality licensed but not fully deployed.
Control gaps
Important controls missing from high-value assets or processes.
Configuration gaps
Controls deployed but not configured effectively.
Coverage gaps
Critical assets, identities, processes or data without adequate protection.
Evidence gaps
Controls claimed in GRC or policy but not supported by operational evidence.
Redundant controls
Multiple tools addressing the same risk without incremental risk reduction.
$1.4M
Annual security tooling spend
$320K
Potentially duplicative or low-value spend identified
$6.8M
Modelled exposure still inadequately controlled

Illustrative figures. Security optimisation becomes a CFO-level discussion, not another technical assessment.

06 · Astragar for Microsoft Security

Turn Microsoft security evidence into business decisions.

Protect your organisation
Turn Defender, Sentinel, Entra, Intune and Purview evidence into financially quantified cyber risk.
Prove your controls
Show which Microsoft controls protect critical assets, processes and data, and model the exposure they reduce.
Prioritise investment
Find the remediation actions with the greatest potential risk reduction for the money spent.
Report to the board
Replace thousands of technical findings with exposure, risk reduction, priorities and ROI.
Test your insurance
Compare residual cyber exposure against policy limits, conditions and exclusions.
Transfer what remains
For eligible US organisations, connect residual risk to cyber insurance placement through Sternwake.

Not another Microsoft security tool

The financial, business-risk and insurance decision layer above your Microsoft estate.

Technical Risk
→
Business Context
→
Financial Exposure
→
Controls
→
Remediation
→
Residual Risk
→
Insurance
Microsoft tells you what happened, what is vulnerable and what needs technical attention.
Astragar answers the next set of questions.
So what does it mean to the business?
How much money is at risk?
Which action creates the greatest reduction in exposure?
How effective are our controls?
What risk remains?
Have we insured it properly?

See how much cyber risk you have, and what your Microsoft controls are worth.

Where to invest next, and whether insurance covers what remains.

Quantify my Microsoft security estate

All figures on this page are illustrative and modelled, not guarantees of loss, savings or coverage. Insurance placement is available to eligible US organisations through Sternwake and is subject to underwriting. Microsoft, Microsoft Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Entra, Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Purview are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. Astragar is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft.

©Astragar All rights reserved.